Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

  1. #1

    1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    What makes the 92 500e models more desirable than the later models? The fact that they are equipped standard with LH WOT module or that the engine block is of close deck design? Way back when I was shopping, someone advised me to get a 92'

    Is the closed deck only desirable if one is hoping to bore it out in the future?

  2. #2
    .036 Hoonigan™
    E500E Boffin
    gsxr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boise, ID, USA
    Posts
    18,880

    Re: FS: 1992 'Euro' LH module w/ WOT enrichment

    Quote Originally Posted by Stevester 500E View Post
    What makes the 92 500e models more desirable than the later models? The fact that they are equipped standard with LH WOT module or that the engine block is of close deck design? Way back when I was shopping, someone advised me to get a 92'
    I'm not sure why some people think 1992 is better. The closed-deck blocks were used through all of 1993 production and into early 1994 (USA) model years as well. Might just be the higher published power rating on the 1992 models.


    Quote Originally Posted by Stevester 500E View Post
    Is the closed deck only desirable if one is hoping to bore it out in the future?
    Yes, that is the only real advantage, IMO. And I've yet to see anyone actually bore out their closed-deck engine.


  3. #3
    Site Admin
    auto enthusiast...
    Glen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Carlsbad, CA USA
    Posts
    2,662

    Re: FS: 1992 'Euro' LH module w/ WOT enrichment

    Up until recently, many considered the '92s more desirable because they have more power and a closed deck block. And of course, some prefer the pre-facelift look.

    But we now know that using an early LH with WOT enrichment in a late car actually makes more power than a '92. Plus, there is factory documentation that shows closed deck blocks were used into the '94 model year. So...IMHO, there really isn't any reason that any model year is more desirable, it all comes down to which one you like best.
    '94 E500 (744) | '94 E500 (199)         Misc. snapshots

  4. #4
    Zivil Ingenieur Maui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,068

    Re: FS: 1992 'Euro' LH module w/ WOT enrichment

    Quote Originally Posted by Glen View Post
    Up until recently, many considered the '92s more desirable because they have more power and a closed deck block. And of course, some prefer the pre-facelift look.

    But we now know that using an early LH with WOT enrichment in a late car actually makes more power than a '92. Plus, there is factory documentation that shows closed deck blocks were used into the '94 model year. So...IMHO, there really isn't any reason that any model year is more desirable, it all comes down to which one you like best.
    I like the look of the pre face lift front end better. It looks more vintage to me. The face lift reminds me of an S model, but seriously I like them all.

    1992 500E
    1994 E500
    2011 E550 4Matic

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    66

    Re: FS: 1992 'Euro' LH module w/ WOT enrichment

    What I was told is that the later models were not built by Porsche, unlike the pre-94 models. Not sure if this is true or not, but have heard this several times from different people. Shouldn't the VIN show the factory designation where the car was built? Does anyone have the answer to this? I have a 94MY car.

  6. #6
    E500E Guru sheward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Cumming, Georgia
    Age
    60
    Posts
    1,899

    Re: FS: 1992 'Euro' LH module w/ WOT enrichment

    This is just a myth. All models were assembled by Porsche. There are many examples of proof of this including pictures here on the board. I like both "variations". The early grill does have a certain vintage look. The later models have a slightly more pleasing trunk shape and better radios. Early models have the nicer cream-beige interior color available.

    drew
    Drew
    92 500e 58,500 miles
    92 500e 180,000+ miles
    93 500e 179,000 miles sold
    92 500e 110,000 miles sold

  7. #7
    .036 Hoonigan™
    E500E Boffin
    gsxr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boise, ID, USA
    Posts
    18,880

    Re: FS: 1992 'Euro' LH module w/ WOT enrichment

    Drew is correct. They were all built by Porsche, through the end of production in 1994 (or 1995?). Not sure where that false information came from originally...


  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    66

    Re: FS: 1992 'Euro' LH module w/ WOT enrichment

    Cool, though I know there is a similar story with the 16v, I think this one may be true, which is that the headers/engine in later models were not done by Cosworth but rather brought back in house by MB.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    25

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    I don't agree that 1992 is better than the later models. In my opinion, the later models have improved gradually which fare better that a 1992. But I guess it all boils down to personal preferences.

  10. #10
    E500E Guru maw1124's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    FL & MI, USA
    Age
    45
    Posts
    1,069

    Re: FS: 1992 'Euro' LH module w/ WOT enrichment

    Quote Originally Posted by Maui View Post
    I like the look of the pre face lift front end better. It looks more vintage to me. The face lift reminds me of an S model, but seriously I like them all.
    My choice was about the vintage look (already had an S Class) and the WOT enrichment. But I don't know about more desirable. If anything, I see a preference for the "facelifted" or "last model year" cars. If it's future value you're concerned about, I think folks will tell you the facelifted '94s are appreciating more rapidly.

    Knowing all that, I'm glad I got a '92.

    ;-D

    maw

  11. #11
    Zivil Ingenieur Maui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,068

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    I personally like the 500E preface lift. It has more of a classic car look and a little more aggressive to my eye. As for power I think a 93 or 94 with WOT is the way to go. 1993 is the best year as far as I am concerned.

    1992 500E
    1994 E500
    2011 E550 4Matic

  12. #12
    Site Admin
    auto enthusiast...
    Glen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Carlsbad, CA USA
    Posts
    2,662

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    The absolute best year is the one (or more) that you own. Having said that, I have a preference for post-facelift cars.
    The one thing that can't be debated is that Brilliant Silver is the fastest color!

    '94 E500 (744) | '94 E500 (199)         Misc. snapshots

  13. #13
    E500E Guru KarlC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    San Diego Ca
    Posts
    1,876

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by Maui View Post
    I personally like the 500E preface lift. It has more of a classic car look and a little more aggressive to my eye. As for power I think a 93 or 94 with WOT is the way to go. 1993 is the best year as far as I am concerned.
    Maui, as usual you are 100% right, 93 is the best year and I have found it to be factual that 040 is the faster color by far. You will know this to be true as you have an 040 car and Glen will soon be changing his mind and painting his 199 car to 040 for the same reason.
    1993 500E - 040 / 271 - Porsche Type 2758 ~~~~ 1971 250C Ivory / Cognac Leather

    Past Cars - 1994 E500 - 2003 CL600 V12TT by SPEEDRIVEN - 1994 E500 - 1995 E320 Cab - 1988 BMW M6 - 1994 E320 Cab

  14. #14
    Site Honcho
    Klugscheisser
    Ich bekenne mich
    nicht schuldig.
    gerryvz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland, USA
    Posts
    15,520

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    The fastest E500E is always the one equipped with NOS, supercharger or a 6.0+ displacement. DB199 is always worth minus 0.2 seconds in the quarter-mile.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #15
    E500E Guru Melville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    721

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by KarlC View Post
    Maui, as usual you are 100% right, 93 is the best year and I have found it to be factual that 040 is the faster color by far. You will know this to be true as you have an 040 car and Glen will soon be changing his mind and painting his 199 car to 040 for the same reason.
    But you forget that the speed benefit conveyed by a particular car is counteracted by a fresh wash and wax of car with a less powerful color. Everyone knows that a freshly washed car is faster, runs better, etc. Now if you steam clean the carpets that's a whole different ball game.

  16. #16
    Site Honcho
    Klugscheisser
    Ich bekenne mich
    nicht schuldig.
    gerryvz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland, USA
    Posts
    15,520

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by Melville View Post
    Now if you steam clean the carpets that's a whole different ball game.
    A fresh set of muffler bearings can work wonders for a car's performance.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  17. #17
    E500E Guru texas993's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Dallas TX
    Posts
    504

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by gerryvz View Post
    A fresh set of muffler bearings can work wonders for a car's performance.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    GVZ, can you please give me a part number for those bearings? And a detailed DIY?

    I will do that after my blinker fluid flush. I am trying to source MB branded and properly aged fluid. Really hard to find. May have to get Vader's help.
    Patrick
    1987 560SL (Current Project Car)
    1995 E300D, 2005 G500
    1997 Porsche 993 C2S, 2011 Porsche Cayenne Turbo
    1993 500E Signal Red / Black SOLD

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to texas993 For This Useful Post:

    wf758 (10-26-2016)

  19. #18
    Clark Vader clarkz71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ft Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    2,087

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    You don't want them from Gerry. He's using OE Benz bearings.

    I have and can get you trick F1 ceramic muffler bearings, way more suited for high heat.

  20. #19
    Clark Vader clarkz71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ft Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    2,087

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by KarlC View Post
    Maui, as usual you are 100% right, 93 is the best year and I have found it to be factual that 040 is the faster color by far. You will know this to be true as you have an 040 car and Glen will soon be changing his mind and painting his 199 car to 040 for the same reason.

    1993 is also the best year the 034, unlike the 036 the 93 400E
    was the 1st year for 275hp. The 92 LH module adds 15 for 290hp

    1992 was 268hp, do the math. 22hp is nothing to sneeze at.

    By the way, both 034/036 use the same muffler bearings

  21. #20
    N2O Junkie J-Sauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    So. Cal.
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,250

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by Melville View Post
    Everyone knows that a freshly washed car is faster
    FALSE! Despite the added weight of the cumulative dirt molecules, a dirty car will still be faster! This is due to an effect similar to the forces acting on a golf ball. The dimples in a golf ball effectively surround it in a pillow of air that reduces its drag and allows it to travel further. Air clings to the smooth surface of a freshly waxed car, while the dirt creates a small layer of turbulence that emulates that pillow of air on a golf ball.
    "Digestion kills r/t's!" -- 400Eric
    Click Here to view my mod thread

    Best E.T. w/ N2O: 12.794 @ 110.82 - N/A: 13.805 @ 102.94



  22. #21
    Zivil Ingenieur Maui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,068

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by clarkz71 View Post
    1993 is also the best year the 034, unlike the 036 the 93 400E
    was the 1st year for 275hp. The 92 LH module adds 15 for 290hp

    1992 was 268hp, do the math. 22hp is nothing to sneeze at.

    By the way, both 034/036 use the same muffler bearings
    The muffler bearings are NLA you'll need to contact URO parts directly but they do come in many colors and finishes.

    1992 500E
    1994 E500
    2011 E550 4Matic

  23. #22
    E500E Guru KarlC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    San Diego Ca
    Posts
    1,876

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by J-Sauce View Post
    FALSE! Despite the added weight of the cumulative dirt molecules, a dirty car will still be faster! This is due to an effect similar to the forces acting on a golf ball. The dimples in a golf ball effectively surround it in a pillow of air that reduces its drag and allows it to travel further. Air clings to the smooth surface of a freshly waxed car, while the dirt creates a small layer of turbulence that emulates that pillow of air on a golf ball.
    LOL that's classic !!!
    1993 500E - 040 / 271 - Porsche Type 2758 ~~~~ 1971 250C Ivory / Cognac Leather

    Past Cars - 1994 E500 - 2003 CL600 V12TT by SPEEDRIVEN - 1994 E500 - 1995 E320 Cab - 1988 BMW M6 - 1994 E320 Cab

  24. #23
    Zivil Ingenieur Maui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,068

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by texas993 View Post
    GVZ, can you please give me a part number for those bearings? And a detailed DIY?

    I will do that after my blinker fluid flush. I am trying to source MB branded and properly aged fluid. Really hard to find. May have to get Vader's help.
    Make sure you sue the green fluid or else your blinkers will become brake lights.

    1992 500E
    1994 E500
    2011 E550 4Matic

  25. #24
    Zivil Ingenieur Maui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,068

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by J-Sauce View Post
    FALSE! Despite the added weight of the cumulative dirt molecules, a dirty car will still be faster! This is due to an effect similar to the forces acting on a golf ball. The dimples in a golf ball effectively surround it in a pillow of air that reduces its drag and allows it to travel further. Air clings to the smooth surface of a freshly waxed car, while the dirt creates a small layer of turbulence that emulates that pillow of air on a golf ball.
    I call foul. Everyone knows professional golfers clean their balls after every hole.

    1992 500E
    1994 E500
    2011 E550 4Matic

  26. #25
    Zivil Ingenieur Maui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,068

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by KarlC View Post
    Maui, as usual you are 100% right, 93 is the best year and I have found it to be factual that 040 is the faster color by far. You will know this to be true as you have an 040 car and Glen will soon be changing his mind and painting his 199 car to 040 for the same reason.
    I've also noticed that I drive faster in the 040 car just so I can get it into the garage and covered up as quickly as possible.

    1992 500E
    1994 E500
    2011 E550 4Matic

  27. #26
    N2O Junkie J-Sauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    So. Cal.
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,250

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by Maui View Post
    I call foul. Everyone knows professional golfers clean their balls after every hole.
    I think you're thinking of another profession. But yes, golfers do clean their equipment, but the dimples are already in the ball!

    http://entertainment.howstuffworks.c...question37.htm
    Attached Images Attached Images
    "Digestion kills r/t's!" -- 400Eric
    Click Here to view my mod thread

    Best E.T. w/ N2O: 12.794 @ 110.82 - N/A: 13.805 @ 102.94



  28. #27
    Zivil Ingenieur Maui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,068

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    I'm a Titleist Pro V1 man myself. The best golf ball ever made.

    A clean dimple is better than a dirty dimple.
    Last edited by Maui; 10-08-2014 at 11:29 PM.

    1992 500E
    1994 E500
    2011 E550 4Matic

  29. #28
    Site Honcho
    Klugscheisser
    Ich bekenne mich
    nicht schuldig.
    gerryvz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland, USA
    Posts
    15,520

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    I am a 1994 owner, but over the years I've tried to look at the ownership thing objectively. I actually like the pre-facelift and facelift grill and trunk about equally - no clear preference for either, and I'd gladly own either/both with no prejudice. If I was forced at gunpoint to make a choice, it would be the facelift grill.

    I think the facelift (generally 1994) models are best because they contained a host of design and mechanical improvements that accumulated during the production life of the cars. The only major negative I can think of for the 1994 (and 1993) cars was the removal of the WOT enrichment, but this is solved easily enough. I don't think the open-deck block is an issue at all; and the aluminum cam oiler tube deal is also solved easily enough (and has not generally (yet) been a major issue for the majority of owners).

    There are other things for the later cars (through the 1993 and for the 1994 model year cars) that are pretty significant pluses for me, from a mechanical standpoint:

    • Waaaaay improved belt tensioner design
    • larger front and rear brakes over earlier cars
    • better & easier to mod/upgrade stock stereo system (US cars)
    • better looking bumper impact strip paint setup (IMHO)
    • better aux fan relay/fuse setup (IMHO)

    My two cents.

    Cheers,
    Gerry

  30. #29
    Site Honcho
    Klugscheisser
    Ich bekenne mich
    nicht schuldig.
    gerryvz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland, USA
    Posts
    15,520

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by texas993 View Post
    GVZ, can you please give me a part number for those bearings?
    003 589 00 45 is the part number.

    Vader's bearings are BOSCH and made in Russia - they are not the BOSCH muffler bearings that are made in Germany for MB. Don't be fooled.

  31. #30

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    +1
    Same theory applies to surfboards. Shiny glassy surfboards have more resistance than sand finished surfboards-similar theory of the golf ball.-
    So, Sauce man, being you have a matte finish on your car by way of the vinyl wrap/plasti-dip, your car has less resistance.
    But the added weight of the plasti-dip might cancel out the benefit of the aero-dynamic advantage your car has, not sure. But your car probably has another advantage, your custom made bumper lip !
    Quote Originally Posted by J-Sauce View Post
    FALSE! Despite the added weight of the cumulative dirt molecules, a dirty car will still be faster! This is due to an effect similar to the forces acting on a golf ball. The dimples in a golf ball effectively surround it in a pillow of air that reduces its drag and allows it to travel further. Air clings to the smooth surface of a freshly waxed car, while the dirt creates a small layer of turbulence that emulates that pillow of air on a golf ball.
    Last edited by Stevester 500E; 10-08-2014 at 11:04 PM.

  32. #31
    postwhore posterchild Klink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Abstract Plains, USA
    Posts
    3,666

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by Maui View Post
    I call foul. Everyone knows professional golfers clean their balls after every hole.
    Quote Originally Posted by J-Sauce View Post
    I think you're thinking of another profession. But yes, golfers do clean their equipment, but the dimples are already in the ball!
    Quote Originally Posted by Maui View Post
    I'm a Titleist Pro V1 man myself. The best golf ball ever made.
    Works on balls too! Just sayin' As Vince Offer says, "It's made in Germany! You know the Germans make good stuff!" For that matter you could use one of Vince's Shamwows with this stuff! "I dunno, It sells itself!"

    Attached Images Attached Images
    Putting the fun in dysfunction...

  33. #32
    E500E Guru maw1124's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    FL & MI, USA
    Age
    45
    Posts
    1,069

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    It's gotta be #20. It's just gotta.

    maw

  34. #33
    Senior Member Jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    S.E. England
    Posts
    421

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    The AC Tempmatic Controller is in the mix when making a choice I think.
    Jim
    1992 No Sun Roof, EVO II's
    May 1991 Facelifted, Renntech Front Anti-Roll Bar, Wiechers Front Strut Brace, 722.370 Gearbox, 2.65 Differential

  35. #34
    postwhore posterchild Klink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Abstract Plains, USA
    Posts
    3,666

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim View Post
    The AC Tempmatic Controller is in the mix when making a choice I think.
    Well, maybe for you over there in Blighty. Here in the land of the free we got them with the single temp pushbutton automatic system only...
    Putting the fun in dysfunction...

  36. #35
    E500E Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    DFW Texas
    Posts
    2,420

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    which ever year is in your driveway is the best=0) Mine is a 93'

  37. #36
    E500E Guru Melville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    721

    Re: 1992 500e models more desirable than the later models?

    Quote Originally Posted by J-Sauce View Post
    FALSE! Despite the added weight of the cumulative dirt molecules, a dirty car will still be faster! This is due to an effect similar to the forces acting on a golf ball. The dimples in a golf ball effectively surround it in a pillow of air that reduces its drag and allows it to travel further. Air clings to the smooth surface of a freshly waxed car, while the dirt creates a small layer of turbulence that emulates that pillow of air on a golf ball.


    You've convinced me. I'm going to stop showering in an effort to shave off some of my commute time in my walk to work. I suspect this will surround me in a pillow of a certain type of air, but maybe not the type that reduces drag. But it will get other people to move out of my way.

Similar Threads

  1. Seeking input on E/SL 55AMG models
    By Trae in forum Off-Topic Discussions
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-16-2013, 02:02 PM
  2. 560SEC Replacement Bulb List (US models)
    By gerryvz in forum C126 Coupes
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-10-2013, 09:21 PM
  3. AMG E400E Models
    By mbforever in forum 400E / E420 Discussions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-12-2012, 03:24 PM
  4. Stock MB amplifiers - 1994 models
    By gerryvz in forum In-Car Entertainment (ICE)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-02-2012, 11:20 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •